Showing posts with label crazy ladies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crazy ladies. Show all posts

Hollywood Crazy

Out of the five movies I've reviewed so far, 3 have featured crazy ladies in starring roles (of course, in "Sucker Punch", the film is in fact playing with the tropes that I mock here by making the "crazy" retreat into fantasy justifiable, sympathetic, tragic, and even heroic).

As for the other 2...one was about drag queens and the other was an extended Freudian metaphor for the devouring mother...so while ladies were prominently featured, it's not really the same thing. You don't have to be crazy to wear drag OR to be a gigantic cave system.

Right? Right!

Now, while "A Streetcar Named Desire" is in another galaxy entirely from "Sucker Punch", and "Black Swan" is within the "Streetcar" planetary system though perhaps many orbits away, they do show certain commonalities in their treatment of insane women.



1. Crazy ladies are hypersexual
Whether they're makin' moves on the paperboy, having elaborate lesbian fantasies, or having elaborate lesbian fantasies with guns and robots and steampunk Nazis...crazy ladies in movies certainly like to get it on. Clearly the corollary is that normal, sane women do not hit on the paperboy. But I have relatives in the suburbs, and, well, sometimes the paperboy is super hot. You'd be insane NOT to hit on him. There is also the insulting corollary that normal, sane women do not have elaborate lesbian fantasies. Sometimes I have my doubts about myself, but I'm pretty sure that this is not the case.

2. Crazy ladies are violent
Crazy ladies in movies hit people, but more often they just stab them. Sometimes they like stabbing folks so much, they get confused and stab themselves. And then they get blood all over their tutus.

This neatly ignores the fact that most people with mental illness are very passive. Depression is one of the most common mental illnesses, and is characterized by social withdrawal. If you are depressed, sometimes you can't even get out of bed in the morning, never mind killing people.

Schizophrenia, which is portrayed by Hollywood as very exciting and entertaining, is also characterized by social withdrawal. In fact, "withdrawal" is one of the main symptoms of schizophrenia listed in the DSM-IV, the diagnostic manual used by American psychologists.

Then there are the anxiety disorders: Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, and the phobias. A person with such a disorder is much more likely to weep in fear than stab the anxiety-provoking stimuli. PTSD, which is portrayed as very exciting indeed, is also an anxiety disorder. While folks with PTSD might be very angry, the diagnostic criteria include a whole list of avoidance behaviour.

Finally, Bipolar. Bipolar people often enough show all the signs of depression, with the same social withdrawal. In a manic phase, a person with bipolar might engage in risky behaviour, but that risky behaviour generally IS NOT axe murder. Maybe they just write a lot...WITHOUT necessarily murdering their families. I'm not going to say people with mental disorders are never violent, but certainly most of the violence in our society comes without a diagnosis.

3. Crazy ladies are incurable
Once a lady goes crazy in a movie, there's no turning back. She's going to spend the rest of her miserable life in a mental institution, and will most likely die in a tragic manner. In real life, most mentally ill people go to a general practitioner and get a prescription for Xanax or an SSRI. They might go to talk therapy, or a support group, too. These options simply aren't available in the movies. If there are any shrinks around, they are invariably clueless and/or evil.

In real life, you can't be admitted to a mental hospital unless you are regarded as a threat to yourself or others, and most people are let out within a matter of days or weeks. In the movies, you don't get admitted until you've already killed someone.

And of course, you never, ever get out in the movies, unless of course you're a Batman villain and the security at your hospital is highly flawed for keeping supervillains. In real life, the "lifers" might be stuck there because they have no family to take them in afterward, or because they have other cognitive problems that would make it impossible for them to survive on the outside: an old woman with severe depression AND dementia, for example. These folks can barely function. They're not supervillains. That's right -- I'm telling you supervillains ARE NOT REAL.


As you can see, "Hollywood crazy" and actual mental disorders are two very different things. "Hollywood crazy" is characterized by a "twisted childhood" or maybe a single, highly disturbing event, that turns a person into an uninhibited monster. "Hollywood crazy"'s symptoms include serial killing, interest in "minority" sexualities, a great sense of humor, and flamboyance. "Hollywood crazy" makes for much more interesting side characters/villains than the bland lead characters you were meant to relate to. But "Hollywood crazy" mostly makes for villains...because disabled people are scary.

On another note...I could probably rewrite this entire post using links exclusively pertaining to the Batman franchise.



Batman is such a dick to patients.

"Sucker Punch": Muppet Babies Hit Puberty!

March 29th: Updated with some observations on the levels of reality in this movie

You may have already heard the premise behind "Sucker Punch": a really smokin' hot femme is locked away in a 1950s mental institute, and she has n days until her lobotomy. Soooo...like anyone else would do in her situation...she has elaborate fantasies involving robots and dragons and machine guns that somehow enable her escape.

This seems almost stupidly straightforward. "Stupidly", because, quite honestly, what the hell do robots have to do with mid-20th century psychiatric medicine?

Well, ok, but that's just barely pertinent.

"Sucker Punch", is, in fact, not that straightforward or even that stupid. I mean, it's kind of stupid...it is often a showcase for explosions and cleavage. But everyone going to see this film wants explosions and cleavage. And it manages to present these showcases for cleavage explosions/explosive cleavage in a way that isn't completely stupid or...Lord help me...antifeminist.

Yes, I am about to tell you that the movie about hot femmes shooting guns in skimpy outfits isn't sexist.

As hard as it may be to believe, judging from the film posters, the overall message of this film is not sexist. It can be summed up as, "Girls are awesome". Girls in this film sacrifice themselves for their sisters, their "sisters" (as in fellow exotic dancers), and for their vaguely lesbian best friends. Girls kick ass and look great while doing so. Girls stab oily rapists in scenes that gave me bad flashbacks to "Black Swan". And they pilot steam-powered mechs in scenes that gave me good flashbacks to "Tank Girl".

Yes, I am about to tell you that "Tank Girl" is a better movie than "Black Swan". Suck it!

The way the movie gets around the inherent stupidity of steam-powered clockwork Nazi zombies is by presenting these scenes as fantasy vignettes triggered by disassociation. It's kind of like "Muppet Babies", except it's as if Kermit and the rest of them are all attractive young women and are trying to escape from a brothel.



The movie treats the dissociative moments in a sympathetic manner, (no matter who is having them). The bad guys might characterize the protagonist, Baby Doll as violently insane, but to the audience she is presented as a brave, self-sacrificing hero, fighting against authoritarian villains and indeed, the patriarchy. Her trips into la-la land grant her the power to do great things. Thus the movie avoids the trap of certain other movies reviewed here, where potentially sympathetic women who are traumatized by violence and sexual assault wind up turning into unsympathetic monsters. Sometimes literally. Ahem.

I guess you can argue that Hollywood crazy somewhat resembles PTSD, which CAN make people very angry as a result of a specific event...but Hollywood crazy really is a special disorder, all its own. Most "crazy" people are not violent, and often are singled out for violence because of their odd behavior. Meanwhile, in real life, often the bad guys are perfectly sane and the ones in charge.

Enough of my harangue. Well, maybe a little more...in "Sucker Punch", the bad guys are indeed the ones in charge. They are rapists and corrupt doctors. And the good guys wind up losing a lot. The ending is not feel-good, because of all of the suffering that leads up to it, although I would call it life-affirming.

And the plot? Well, there's a plot. It can be a little cheap at times.

I really liked the overall message of women working as a team to help one another. It warmed my frosty heart.



Or maybe I've just been taken in by how pretty the damn movie is, and all the explosions and swords.

I don't think so, though. I think, indeed, that anybody who calls this a bad movie, or boring, or unimaginative, probably doesn't have a soul.

I give "Sucker Punch" 4 stars, and if you don't like that, you can go watch Natalie Portman yank her cuticles off.

3 stars for "Is that a biplane? No, it's a triplane! No, seriously, 3 wings!"
And 1 star for "Not being completely stupid", which is all I really asked for anyway.

****
Update: On another level, perhaps nothing in the film actually happens except for the very beginning and the lobotomy scene toward the end. All the rest is disassociation in reaction to extreme abuse. Or maybe it's the other way around, and the brothel is real, the disassociation still occurs, though for other reasons, and the protagonist isn't who you think at all. The movie mostly follows the character named "Baby Doll", who is champion of these fantasy vignettes. She is the one who appears to be spacing out during the fantasy sequences. But does she exist at all?

"Where Is My Mind" is featured prominently throughout the film. The same song ended "Fight Club", in a very plot-appropriate way. Certainly the song is thematically related to "Sucker Punch", but maybe it's also a hint? The film is open to multiple interpretations.

The very same twists that seem to come out of nowhere on first viewing really do enrich the film. Underneath the action is a tragic and serious story! No really. Shocker number 3. Yet I do not think that ruins the enjoyment of the action sequences.

New "Sucker Punch" Poster

"Sucker Punch" is a movie meant to appeal to the 13 year old boy within us all (ahem). It has girls, guns, dragons, biplanes, giant mechs, and probably a nuclear-powered kitchen sink (although it isn't in the film poster). Slated for a March 25, 2011 release after some delay, it will hopefully be more than just a collection of boobs and explosions...it's by the guy who did "300" and that owl movie, so...yeah. I mean "hopefully" in the most hopeful way possible.

Also: more crazy women! -- the protagonist is in a mental institution. The more things change, Hollywood, the more things change...

Here's the new poster, covering all the key 13 year old bases:



This movie is like meeting a cute girl in a Ramones T-shirt. You get all excited, and then you remember it's not 1979 anymore, and people look at YOUR blue hair and think you're into The Killers or some shit.

Check out the trailer below.



Can "Sucker Punch" deliver? I'm praying it does. The angsty voice-over at the beginning is awful, but the explosions sure are pretty...

And here's to something old school that always delivered: Tank Girl!

"Black Swan": Oral Sex Can Kill You!


I went into this movie (oops) fully expecting to hate it. I mean, it's a movie about ballet (cooties!), and the reviews I've read seemed to suggest it was homophobic.

I did not, in fact, hate "Black Swan". Sometimes it was gross, and sometimes it made me angry, but mostly I thought it was funny. This is a movie that hates the fact that human beings have bodies. I can not imagine anything more ridiculous...

I also didn't expect to find so many similarities to "A Streetcar Named Desire", but, even leaving aside the fact that "Streetcar" is still fresh in my mind, the parallels are plentiful.

1. Both movies hate, hate, HATE sex. "Streetcar" offers sex appeal and then cruelly yanks it away, leaving you with incest, pedophilia, spousal abuse, and rape, while "Black Swan" barely gets as far as holding hands before making you feel like a terrible person. The movie from 1951 is actually more progressive in that regard.

2. Both movies offer us horny females who go absolutely, positively, woo-hoo insane because of their horniness. Granted, Nina (Natalie Portman) is on opposite sides of the fucking planet from Blanche, in regards to acting on her desire. However, it's still desire that gets the two of them into trouble. Woops, I meant "terrifying madness and/or death".

3. Finally, both movies really don't like the fact that men and women exist. And not in a queer, "down with gender" kind of way. It's more like a "you are sinful for existing" thing (see link above). In both movies, men are portrayed as insensitive, sex-crazed brutes and women are portrayed as jealous, sex-crazed lunatics. Hey, maybe it isn't just these two movies...maybe it's Hollywood. However, a "Streetcar"/"Black Swan" double feature would really make a great field trip for an abstinence only sex ed class!



On to our feature presentation...

The movie starts with Natalie Portman (Nina) dancing with a big ugly man in an awful sweater, who eventually turns into Satan, or maybe a Mexican wrestler, or a chicken. And so the tone has been set. Off we go on a sinister subway ride, where a cute chick is spotted in the opposite car -- or is it only Nina's reflection?

Nina is a ballerina, who has a creepy relationship with her mom, and is so femme she makes Barbie look like Vin Deisel. She trains in an underground torture chamber. Oh wait, that's Lincoln Center. You know, I was just by Lincoln Center to visit the Performing Arts Library, and it didn't look particularly grim then. Maybe because it was daylight...

Enter the asshole director, who gives us some exposition on "Swan Lake". The good, pure White Swan is bested by the evil, slutty Black Swan, "and in death finds freedom". That's almost as subtle as Blanche telling a sailor, "They told me to take a streetcar named Desire and transfer to one named Cemetery." Actually, it's even less subtle, since at least that was a metaphor.

And how the hell does a bird kill itself by jumping off a cliff, anyway? Very deliberately?



Ok, so, we already know how the movie ends. Nina dies. Time to go!

Wait. There's that sexy girl from the subway ride!

Sexy girl's name is Lily, and she's "straight off the plane from San Francisco". Straight indeed. Nina's already got a queer eye for her.

There's some bitchiness from the other ballerinas, and there's some bulimia, there's some toe cracklin', and Nina is menaced by graffiti...then we have the wrinkly old asshole director sticking his tongue in her mouth. She bites him. Good for her!

In accordance with Hollywood logic, this is exactly what she needed to do to prove herself. She gets the lead role in "Swan Lake", over Veronica, who is mean and wears too much makeup.

Nina celebrates by calling her mom, and by getting completely freaked out by a slur written on her mirror. Even worse, mom has to get all weird about her cake. If you go by this movie, bulimia is just part of the job, but getting upset when your daughter won't eat cake is crazy and abusive.

The next scene is all ribs and nipples, in case you were feeling ok about Nina not eating cake. Asshole director (his name is Tomas) watches her dance the pure, virginal White Swan. He tells her, "The real work will be your metamorphosis into her evil twin." I agree, I hear that kind of thing is exhausting.

Bloody cuticles scene. You know, I bite my cuticles all the time (I know, it's gross), and it never sounds like that...



More assholery from the asshole director. Nina is called a cocksucker by Winona Ryder. There's an ugly damn bird-man sculpture. Is this at the Museum of the American Indian? You know, I once did a drawing project just like that, it was all about a man sacrificing himself for art and science, and transforming himself into a bird...

Tomas continues to be an asshole by taking a less-than-eager Nina back to his room for sex. When she resists, he suggests she go fuck herself, quite literally. What a charming guy.

Nina returns home. Now, I scribbled down a series of notes at this point. They're just sentence fragments, but I think they get the point across all by themselves:

Exposed spine
Scratching herself
Oozing
Mom strips [Nina] topless & sucks bleeding finger

In other words: ewwww.

Well, after all that, Nina decides to go to her room and take the asshole's advice. Surrounded by pink, fluffy stuffed animals, she lies in bed and rummages under the covers to her crotch. It's not very sexy, since she has the body of a prepubescent, and is even wearing little girl Underoos. It gets even less sexy when we, and Nina, realize that Mom is in the room.

Winona Ryder's character, Beth, meanwhile, decides to throw herself into traffic. We don't actually see this, but the asshole director suggests to Nina that she intentionally got hit by a car. You see, Beth was the former head ballerina at the company, and the asshole fired her for being old. Then she got hit by a car. Does he seem guilty or remorseful about it? Not particularly. He is truly a prince among men.

More scabs. More sexual harassment: "I'll be the prince" indeed. He paws at her little girl body as a sort of tutorial. She needs to be more passionate, and nothing gets a woman's blood flowing like RAPE.

Enter sexy Lily, with bad-girl cigarettes. She is much prettier than Tomas, or hell, even Nina, who has this weird skin rash...she is also genuinely charming and would be the most sympathetic character in the film if the film didn't consider female sexuality completely evil.

"Someone's hot for teacher..," Lily surmises, when Nina defends Asshole Tomas. I think I threw up in my popcorn.

Bloody fingernail clipping. You know, I could have sworn that this sort of thing was a specifically MALE metaphor for fear of sex and the castration complex...but then again, I wouldn't want to see what the movie would come up with for a specifically female version.



Another evil subway ride, on the Hogwarts Express to Hell. Grandpa sits across from Nina and mimes fingering her. Boy howdy, does this movie hate sex.

Nina and mom argue. Nina takes off with Lily to the evilest night club in New York City. Lily gets her drunk, introduces her to frat boys, and gives her E. This can not end well. And it doesn't.

While Nina is half passed out from all the booze and drugs, Lily fingers her. Has nobody in this film ever heard of consent? Next up: Nina arguing with her mom. That's kind of a good thing, since her mom is too attached to her. Then Lily has ambiguously real oral sex with Nina, accompanied by disgusting sound effects, because how dare the audience enjoy it?

It ends with Nina waking up alone and throwing out all her creepy toys. Wow, that wasn't so bad afterall. Maybe sex isn't such a bad --

GAY PANIC!

Nina starts going...well, less sane. She is all sweaty and gristly the day before her starring role. She is hallucinating, complete with ominous music and huge shadows. "Black Swan" temporarily transforms into a slasher flick. And Nina temporarily transforms into...oh come on! That's actually the ankle joint, not the knee! There's absolutely no need for that popping noise either!



Well, I guess female independence means going insane. That's what puberty is for. On to the dance!

Everything is going great until Lily's man-whore "accidentally" drops Nina. For that, Lily (certainly not her man-whore) must die. So she dies. Or maybe she doesn't. Who can tell at this point? Nina kisses Pickle-Puss asshole Tomas, which is this movie's way of saying "Nina has become an independent adult", and my way of saying "That's disgusting!"

It's bad enough that Nina has just killed her lesbian crush in favor of an oily old leather bag of a man...but he's been a little rape-y throughout the movie. The only reason he doesn't, in fact rape her is...um...I'm at a loss for reasons. Because it would give "Black Swan" an X-rating?

Oh G-d, I can already hear the sound effects...

But Lily isn't dead...or evil...and something about pushing shards of glass into a pussy...I mean, a tutu, and then...oh fuck, this is worse than menarche.

If I had to give this film a star rating, it would be 2 and a half out of 5:

1 for "keeping my attention" (how could it not, with all those bleeding sores?)
1 for "making me afraid of ballerinas" (see above)
And 1 half star for "lesbian sex scene which was actually kind of hot if you ignore the amplified slurping sounds"

Despite my first impression, I did not wind up hating this movie. It has such a vile message I almost ENJOY hating it, which makes me like it...but then I remember why I hate it again. So in the end, I like hating it, which is different from simply hating it.

Natalie Portman put in an excellent performance, and I'm going to do an image search for the actress who played Lily right now.

New Movies? What New Movies?: A Streetcar Named Desire


If you're like me, the only thing you know about this movie, going in, is that it involves Marlon Brandon in a Fruit of the Loom undershirt, screaming "Stella!" for some reason. Also that it's by Tennessee Williams, that beloved of high school English curriculum, with The Glass Menagerie.

Well, I read The Glass Menagerie in high school, and it creeped me the hell out. I'm not saying it was a bad read, but between the CA-RAAAAZY mother and poor little possibly autistic Laura, I could easily imagine the play being remade into a horror movie. And maybe it was...

But Mr. Williams was rather fond of the lads...and Brando in a wifebeater must have turned on more than a few of them, even back in the closeted 50s. So it seemed like good material for this blog.

For clarity's sake, I watched "The Original Director's Version", which has 3 extra minutes of footage compared to the version you may have seen. Assuming you've seen it. Surely my readers aren't as ignorant as me, whose childhood consisted of multiple, forced viewings of classic films such as Son in Law (Steven Tyler PJs!) and the original release of Hairspray (yes, that's Sonny Bono).

So now that I have thoroughly established myself as an uncultured ignoramus, let's get back to Marlon Brando before he turned into this:

Brando is the one on the right.


We begin the movie with cabs and trains and a stridently noirish saxophone. We are in old New Orleans. The virginal Blanche DuBois emerges from a cloud of steam. You will soon learn that Blanche is somewhat less than virginal, but in these early scenes, she seems vulnerable and naive. She asks an out of focus sailor for directions, explaining, "They told me to take a streetcar named Desire and transfer to one named Cemetery." This is already a beautifully shot film, but clearly not one for subtlety...

Blanche winds up in a neighborhood that reminds me of walking down Rivington one night, looking for ABC No Rio. Except that, whereas I was surrounded by overdressed yuppies leaving bars, Blanche has hookers and men carrying chickens by their feet to contend with. She's looking for her sister Stella's house, but Stella's out. Blanche asks a neighbor where to find her. Despite first impressions, it's NOT at a brothel or an opium den...no, Stella is very prosaically "watching her husband bowl".

This is not entirely correct.

Actually, Stella is watching her husband BRAWL (albeit at a bowling alley), and she seems to be quite turned on by it, too. We, and Blanche, are aghast.

So we, and Blanche, go out for a drink with Stella. We soon learn that Blanche is rather neurotic, and that she has recently left her job teaching English. She needs a place to stay. And she's "so hot and dirty and tired". The two sisters compliment each other's appearance, and order more drinks. Sounds like the makings of a good time to me! Except that they're sisters. And that's gross.

The next scene reveals that, fancy wrought iron staircase aside, Stella's living arrangements are little better than a squat. Blanche is very concerned about the lack of doors: "Will Stanley be decent?" "Oh, Stanley is Polish, you know," replies Stella, which seems like it should be a Polish joke about being too stupid to wear clothes properly. Since Stanley is rarely seen wearing much more than an undershirt, maybe it is.

The close personal contact between the two sisters in this scene begins to set off my gaydar. Blanche of course has to ruin it by getting wild-eyed and crazy, talking about the loss of the family home and reciting poetry about death. Jeez. This might have been cute in high school, but now I know better than to pine for goth chicks!



Now we have Brando's -- I mean, Stanley's -- formal entrance. He's so sweaty and nonchalant, such a contrast to the two sister's stagey acting. It's like he's stepped into this movie from the future. You almost expect him to be in full technicolor, the Land of Oz to Stella and Blanche's Kansas. As he explains to Blanche, he's sweaty because he's been "exercising hard [...] bowling".

Brando, I mean Stanley, seems most amused by the sexual power he holds over the two ladies. He's much more amused by it than he is interested in Stella's kisses and caresses, or Blanche's eyelash fluttering. He is hot and he knows it. Sure, his slurred speech makes him sound like he's taken too many shots to the head, but he looks good in tight T-shirts, so it doesn't matter too much and might even be a selling point. Blanche certainly doesn't seem to mind yet. She's flirting with him like a little Southern hussy.

"HOW ABOUT CUTTING THE REBOP?!!" suggests Stanley, and the next thing you know, Blanche is gibbering to Stella about babies...and rockets...and adultery. She is giving bisexual women a bad name.

So, Stanley's playing poker with a Mexican stereotype (we know he's Mexican because he wears a funny hat), and another guy in a hat who thinks domestic violence is funny, and Mitch, who is balding, and has a weird lump on his nose. Stella tries to break the game up, but Stanley hits her.

Meanwhile, Blanche is flirting with everything wearing pants. She is coming on strong to Mitch, even though Mitch looks like Al Bundy. It dawns on me that she only flirts with women when there aren't any men around to molest. She sure has a lot in common with the girls I knew in high school...and she reinforces this impression with attention seeking behaviours, such as playing bad music too loud, and wearing skimpy clothing.



Stanley thankfully ends her mentally unstable mating ritual by throwing the radio out the window. That's exactly what I wanted to do, too. But then he beats Stella up, which is mean. There's a bunch of confusing "roofah", and it all ends with four sweaty, muscular young men in a shower together. As a wise man once said, "Ho yay!"

Or maybe "STELLLLAAAAAAAA!", because that's the next scene.

Stella and a soaking-wet Stanley make out, with Blanche chasing after them, in pursuit of the most hellishly concieved threesome this side of No Exit. Now it's Stella's turn to be mentally unstable, as she explains to Blanche afterward that Stanley's abuse isn't alarming or traumatic, that it is actually quite arousing. If I were Blanche, I would say, "Masochism is one thing. Stockholme syndrome is quite another." I mean, I've known some people in abusive relationships...but they were not specifically TURNED ON by the abuse. Even people into whips and spanking would generally disapprove of getting beaten up in front of their husband's poker buddies during a drunken rage.



The scene continues with more sisterly love. At several moments, I am certain that the famous "Tennesee Williams lesbian sex scene" is about to begin...but alas. Of course Stella is in her slip, because people in New Orleans hate to wear clothing. And it really does not help the case for heterosexuality that Blanche is trying to convince Stella to leave her husband. In fact, the look on Blanche's face when Stella runs up and hugs Stanley is priceless. Yet it also raises the question: why all this competition for Stella? She's not a tremendous looker and she seems even slower than Stanley Kowalski himself. But then again, I felt the same about Britney Spears circa 1999, so maybe I'm just tough to impress...

Hmm...Stella would definitely be a big fan of "Hit Me Baby, One More Time". She'd karaoke the hell out of that shit.

Next scene: more domestic violence, this time NOT by Stanley. Stanley does give Blanche a bit of a talking to, though, concerning her, and men, and cheap hotels. Blanche mentions to Stella something about "turning the trick", but Stella tells her that she never listens to her when she's being morbid. That's probably the safest way to go.

"Honey," she tells the already toasted Blanche, "don't take another drink." If only she had sense enough to say the same thing to her husband...

Thankfully, the paperboy arrives. Blanche reverts to femme bot mode. In her defense, he is quite well-dressed for a paperboy. He is wearing more clothing than Stella and Stanley combined. We learn from their conversation that "cherries make [Blanche's] mouth water." Indeed! "Did anybody ever tell you you look like a prince out of Arabian nights?" asks Blanche. "You do, honey lamb." I hope all the pick up artists out there are taking notes.

Once again, Blanche has to wrench away any voyeuristic pleasure you may be deriving from her actions: "I've got to be good and keep my hands off children." Then her boyfriend, Mitch arrives.

I sure hope he doesn't marry her...



Blanche is a moody bastard on their date. "I don't think I've ever tried so hard to be gay," she says, by way of apology. Quit lying, Blanche! You try very, very hard. It just gets more awkward from there. I begin to suspect that Blanche is just leading poor Mitch along, to serve as a cover for hot, nasty, paperboy sex. They are going to get married, and she is going to have babies that aren't his, and it will be just like that story by Isaac Singer. I mean, Jerry Springer.

Just when you think it can't get any worse, Blanche starts talking about her ex-boyfriend. The dead one. The one she made commit suicide. Mitch, naturally enough, kisses her. I would be jumping off the pier and swimming to Cuba.

Next, we have Stanley yelling. He's on the job, but that doesn't stop him from yelling. Nothing, nobody, stops Stanley Kowalski from yelling. Mitch wants to punch him, because he said something mean yet doubtlessly true about Blanche. The next scene has Stanley saying lots of mean yet true (and honestly hilarious), things about Blanche. Meanwhile, Blanche swishes around and sings in French, oblivious or perhaps just insane.


Although Stanley is very funny, and has saved Mitch from the worst marriage in the world (next to his own), he still comes across as a self-serving dick
. He wants Stella to himself; he does not want to share her with incestuous, bisexual, sexually loose Southern belle pedophiles with severe mood disorders. That would almost be fine, except that he beats the crap out of his wife and willfully manipulates her.



Can things get any worse? Yes!

Blanche emerges from the bathroom and it's back to Crazytown. She appears to be downright delusional as she begs Stanley to tell her a funny story. By now, it is certain that this will not end well...it will not even end badly...it will end horribly. You will wet your pants.

"Do you like parrot stories?" Blanches asks vivaciously.

No, Blanche, I do not. Just...just...

JUST STOP TALKING AND LEAVE.

FOR YOUR SAKE, FOR EVERYONE'S SAKE, JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP AND RUN, RUN AWAY, AS FAST AS YOU CAN.

So what does she do? She tells the parrot story.

Stanley smashes things, which is both shocking and not shocking at all, considering his character and the circumstances (I hate parrot stories, too). Then we are reminded that Stella is pregnant. Because the best thing to do to a fucked up, failing marriage is to bring a child into it.

Stanley makes a lovely little speech about his Polish heritage. This would be heroic, except that he's screaming at a trembling woman on the brink of a nervous breakdown. Then he gives Blanche a bus ticket out of New Orleans, in case you still felt positively about him, for some reason.

Then Stella goes into labor.



Can things get any worse? Hell yes!

A thoroughly drunk Blanche has yet another awkward conversation with Mitch. Did I say "awkward"? I meant terrifying. I meant psychotic and brutal.

"I was fool enough to believe you were straight," says Mitch, to unintentionally lighten the mood.

"Straight? What's straight?" asks the crazy lady. She gets to ranting again. Ominous music plays. Mitch kisses her. Cue the strobe lights. Cue the crazed screaming.

Can things possibly get any worse? Sure, why not?!

Blanche goes completely batshit crazy. Now, she wasn't exactly stable before, so you really have to see her now. It defies description. Of course Stanley saunters in as she's talking to herself. Where's my Xanax?

"Let's have a little rough house," suggests Stanley. And by that he means rape.

Blanche is now completely, double dog dare, super saiyan batshit crazy. She is so crazy, that even the crazy people around her want to put her in a home. And just when you think to yourself, "Things can not, simply CAN NOT get any worse. We have truly hit the pit bottom of insanity," there's a picture of the baby. And then the psychiatrists arrive. And then Blanche starts thrashing around wildly like she's having a seizure...

This is almost unbearable. This is almost like high school.

In sum, this movie's idea of a happy ending is to have a battered wife take her baby in her arms, and run to the neighbors as her husband screams at her.

I think that from now on, I will only review lighter fare, such as Black Swan.

This is a very good, and very homoerotic movie, don't get me wrong. But Tennessee Williams scares the SHIT out of me.